+1 on ISO 3166-2 gb.-
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Selena Deckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Emanuel CALVO FRANCO > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> From here on out, non-country pugs will have to have at least 3 >>> characters in their abbreviation! >>> >> >> so, will be rename ArgPug? > > If we follow ISO 3166-2, it would be 'arpug'. > >>> I'll handle the issue with BWPUG (ISO 3166-2 assigns BW to Botswana), >>> if/when it comes up. >>> >>> I still like having the messy naming for the rest of the groups. >>> There's no one standard that's going to address regional, state, >>> province and municipality all at once. >>> >> >> It's a hard work... i think every country must have a general pug, >> then each must allow local groups. > > It's not necessary to have a PUG for every country. > > We are just going to reserve the two-letter prefixes for country codes > from now on. > > We will continue to have language-specific lists, which are not > exclusive to a single country. > > -selena > > -- > Selena Deckelmann > PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx > Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily > -- > TIP 10: no uses HTML en tu pregunta, seguro que quien responda no podrá leerlo > -- TIP 8: explain analyze es tu amigo
