On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andr...@a-kretschmer.de > wrote:
> Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication > is, that you can define what to replicate. That wouldn't work in this way, > that's why i'm asking. One of the key aspects of "standby" is that it is ready to be a drop-in replacement for the "active" server, and today our logical replication facility is not capable of ensuring that property and won't be for v11 that I can tell. I'm not certain that said capability is even a goal at present. IOW, why do you need a "standby" that isn't a drop-in replacement for a primary - i.e., can have a filter on what replicated data it accepts? David J.
