On October 10, 2018 2:15:19 PM PDT, Ravi Krishna <srkrish...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> pg_restore doesn't take locks on the table for the COPY, it does so
>> because creating the table takes an exclusive lock.
>
>
>Interesting. I seem to recollect reading here that I can't have
>concurrent COPY on the same table because of the lock.
>To give an example:
>
>If I have a large file with say 400 million rows, can I first split it
>into 10 files of 40 million rows each and then fire up 10 different
>COPY sessions , each reading from a split file, but copying into the
>same table. I thought not. It will be great if we can do this.
Yes, you can.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
