On 1/24/19 3:04 AM, Alexandre GRAIL wrote:
Hello the list,

Maybe this question has been debated before (I didn't find anything helpful) but :

Why the default is to throw an error when casting Integer to Boolean in assignment, and accepting it everywhere else ?

The overall reason:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/release-8-3.html

E.24.2.1. General

Non-character data types are no longer automatically cast to TEXT (Peter, Tom)

Previously, if a non-character value was supplied to an operator or function that requires text input, it was automatically cast to text, for most (though not all) built-in data types. This no longer happens: an explicit cast to text is now required for all non-character-string types. For example, these expressions formerly worked:


So you can type :

postgres=# select 1::boolean;
  bool
------
  t
(1 row)

or

postgres=# select 0::boolean;
  bool
------
  f
(1 row)


But you *cannot* use 1 or 0 as valid input for boolean type when inserting or updating :

test=# CREATE TABLE test1 (a boolean);
CREATE TABLE
test=# INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (1);
ERROR:  column "a" is of type boolean but expression is of type integer
LINE 1: INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (1);
                                   ^
HINT:  You will need to rewrite or cast the expression.


This behavior cannot be changed, as this cast is hard coded with "Implicit?=no".

And added to this weirdness is the fact that '1' or '0' (with quote) is OK.

So is there a reason to forbid 0 and 1 as valid boolean, without explicit cast ?

Thanks!






--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com

Reply via email to