> When I said “supported version” of BDR, I mostly meant a newer version of Postgres. I know you have to decide on getting support BDR but regardless of what route you take, part of your plan needs to be > 9.4 :).
I agree with you. We will be upgrading to the latest postgres version. On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:48 AM Jeremy Finzel <finz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ruben Rubio Rey <tk42...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jeremy, >> >> > Why don't you consider upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a >> supported version of BDR? There is nothing better you can do to keep your >> infrastructure up to date, performant, secure, and actually meet your >> multi-master needs than to upgrade to a newer version of postgres which >> does have BDR support. >> >> This is something that we have definitely thought of. That would be a >> good alternative but I have an strong feeling that the business won't be >> willing to pay for it. The cost of the paid BDR version, in comparison with >> the current fixed expenses of the infrastructure, are just too large. >> That's why we are researching alternatives. >> > > When I said “supported version” of BDR, I mostly meant a newer version of > Postgres. I know you have to decide on getting support BDR but regardless > of what route you take, part of your plan needs to be > 9.4 :). > > Thanks, > Jeremy >
