It was just 99 files of 1GB each for each id, and no I didn't vacuum.
I did see disk usage dropping quite a lot after dropping those tables
though, so I expected postgres to delete all unneccesary files for all the
tables.

However when checking just now I saw that the files I was referring to were
indeed deleted somehow (don't have an autovacuum running).
So not sure how or why, but my problem is solved

On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:06 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
wrote:

> On 4/12/19 1:11 PM, Paul van der Linden wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For my process, I needed to drop all the tables in a tablespace except
> > one which I truncated.
> > After that I would have expected to have a couple of KB max in that
> > folder, but there was about 200GB in it.
> >
> > There were 2 sets of files (<id1>, <id1>.1 .. <id1>.99, and the same for
> > id2).
>
> Can you show the actual dir listing?
>
> > Tried the various options from
> > https://blog.2ndquadrant.com/postgresql-filename-to-table/ and oid2name
> > (with -i), to trace it back to a table but all came up empty.
> >
> > Now this folder has a bit of a history spanning several postgres
> > versions and upgrades, and sometime in the past one of the upgrades went
> > horribly wrong, so my first thought was that this was possibly some
> > leftovers from that mishap, but the filetimes were a bit later than that.
> > Also hard to tell because those tables are used as write-once, read-alot
> > so could not base the last usage on filedate.
> >
> > Normally I probably would dare to risk deleting those files, but after
> > the dropping and truncating, the 2 files without extension had the time
> > of drop/truncate and were 0 bytes in length (unfortunately I didn't
> > check the filesize before drop/truncating).
> >
> > Are there other options to see if these files are leftovers from
> > previous stuff and not used by postgres (so i can safely delete them)?
> >
> > Postgres 11, just one used database on it (the other one being a postgis
> > template), running on windows server 2012.
> >
> > In replies please use reply to all...
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>

Reply via email to