--> But the right answer is to fix it on the writing side.
Yes I agree with this part. Even though there is very low probability, a
process can still be killed in middle when writing. So what is your
suggestion on how to recover from this automatically?

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:14 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> neeraj kumar <neeru....@gmail.com> writes:
> > Also curious why query on pg_stat_activity is considering terminated
> > process ?
>
> The short answer to that is that this bug leaves shared memory in
> a corrupt state.  It's not really useful to worry about whether
> readers should react differently to that --- you could spend endless
> amounts of time hypothesizing different kinds of corruption and
> endless amounts of code/cycles trying to work around it.  But the
> right answer is to fix it on the writing side.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>


-- 
-------------------------------------
Thanks
Neeraj Kumar,
+1  (206) 427-7267

Reply via email to