>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> However, we need to fix this in all active branches, and I Tom> definitely agree with minimizing the amount of change to back Tom> branches. The fact that the minimal change breaks (or exposes an Tom> oversight in) assign_collations_walker makes it very plausible Tom> that it will also break somebody's third-party code. If we push Tom> the API change further we increase the risk of breaking stuff. Tom> That seems OK in HEAD but not in back branches. We could minimize the chance of breakage in a back-patched fix by having query_tree_walker/mutator iterate the windowClause list itself and invoke the walker only on offset expressions; is it worth it? Walkers that follow the recommended code structure should be unaffected; it only shows up in the collations walker because that treats expressions as the "default" case and tries to explicitly handle all non-expression nodes. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
