> On Apr 6, 2020, at 19:44 , David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:12 PM Guyren Howe <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Consider this:
>
> select (array[array[1, 2], array[3, 4]])[i:i]
> from generate_subscripts(array[array[1, 2], array[3, 4]], 1) i
>
> which produces:
>
> {{1,2}}
> {{3,4}}
>
> I expect and want, from that source:
>
> {1, 2}
> {3, 4}
>
>
> Also: could we _please_ get a version of unnest that doesn’t explode any
> number of dimensions into 1?
Here’s a solution in pure SQL, for reference:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.pairwise(
cards card[]
)
RETURNS table(c1 card, c2 card)
LANGUAGE sql
AS $function$
with
individual_cards as (
select
*
from
unnest(cards) with ordinality c
)
select
c(c1.suit, c1.rank),
c(c2.suit, c2.rank)
from
individual_cards c1 join
individual_cards c2 on c1.ordinality = c2.ordinality - 1
where
c1.ordinality % 2 = 1
$function$
;
Given that Postgres often (with good cause) touts its type system, it’s a shame
that this basic structured type is great in many ways, but seriously flawed in
really simple ones.
