David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > Maybe this would be better?
> "returns true if jit is enabled and JIT compilation is available in > this session (see Chapter 31)." The general, non-hacker meaning of "jit is enabled" would seem to be pretty much what this function is already doing; and for that matter, the same can be said for "JIT compilation is available". We need something that's less tautological-looking. Maybe along the lines of "returns true if a JIT compiler extension is available and the <varname>jit</varname> parameter is set to <literal>on</literal>; when this is true, JIT compilation will be performed." ? regards, tom lane