Hi, My concern is a purely commercial, in this case.
We work only for “large” companies. Only telecommunications operators (more than 5 million subscribers) In this environment the “IBM / SAP / Accenture” effect is very strong - “I chose the leader, it is not my fault that it failed” So, having something like PL/java when it is not “supported” by anyone with a markeatable name is always a barrier. Furthermore, if it is not in the Postgres.org<http://Postgres.org> supported things, it will not be available in AWS RDS service, AWS Aurora, Azure xyz, Citus…, which limits our deployment options. Thanks, — Zé Rui Marques ze.rui.marq...@carrotincentives.com<mailto:ze.rui.marq...@carrotincentives.com> +351 919507949 carrotincentives.com<http://carrotincentives.com> On 07-12-2020, at 14:45, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com<mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>> wrote: On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote: Hi, I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised ETL platform. Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting everything to Postgres. All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of our code within the database to be also in java. The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres. I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official procedural language. If so, when? None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is not going to help you. What is your concern? Thanks, *—* *Zé Rui Marques* -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com<mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>