*Question 1: why does "pg_constraint" have a "connamespace" column?*
I created this temporary view (using PG 14.4): create temporary view all_constraints(t_owner, t_schema, t_name, c_name, same) as select r.rolname, s.nspname, c.relname, x.conname, (x.connamespace = c.relnamespace) from pg_class c inner join pg_roles r on c.relowner = r.oid inner join pg_namespace s on c.relnamespace = s.oid inner join pg_constraint x on c.oid = x.conrelid where c.relkind = 'r'; I created three tables, each with a user-created constraint. The tables also have implicitly created primary key constraints. Then I did this: select count(*) from all_constraints; It said that the count is over a hundred. (All but the rows for my three tables are for rows for tables in the "pg_catalog" schema.) Then I did this: select exists(select 1 from all_constraints where not same)::text; It said "false". Over one hundred seems to be a fair sample size. So it seems to be reasonable to assume that "pg_constraint.connamespace = pg_class.relnamespace" is always true. Ordinary common-sense analysis of the query suggests this too. If the hypothesis is right, then "connamespace" is simply a derived value. And this would be a departure from usual table design practice. What do you think? *Question 2: what happened to the column "consrc"?* The PG 11 account of "pg_constraint" https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/catalog-pg-constraint.html describes "consrc" (text) thus: « If a check constraint, a human-readable representation of the expression » Ad hoc queries in my PG 11.9 env show results like « (v = lower(v)) » in this column for my tables. This is useful information. But the PG 14 version of "pg_constraint" has no such column (and nor does the doc mention it). Is this information now exposed somewhere else?
