On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 16:38:08 -0500 p...@pfortin.com wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:59:20 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>p...@pfortin.com writes:
>>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:47:35 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I think you misunderstand how this is supposed to work. The -D
>>>> argument should point at an *empty* data directory that has been
>>>> freshly initialized with the new version's initdb. pg_upgrade then
>>>> transfers data into that from the old database (-d argument).
>>
>>> I was hoping to avoid the hours worth of copying to the NVMe SSD.
>>> The instructions refer to upgrading with --link; would that save the copy
>>> time?
>>
>>Yes, but to use --link you must have both data directories on the
>>same filesystem, so this is still the wrong thing.
>>
>>Try something like
>
>My understanding:
>> mv /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data13
>- renames the DB
>
>> initdb /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data
>- creates new DB
>
>> pg_upgrade ... -d /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data13 -D
>> /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data --link ...
>- if this only creates hard links; then this should do what I want.
> My big concern was due to the DB being about 65% of /mnt/work; so doing
> it on the same file system absolutely requires hard links vs copying...
>
>Looks like this is what I was trying to be certain of... Thanks!!
>Pierre
Sigh... I thought all was good... This was not expected and is not
discussed in the pg_upgrade instructions:
[postgres@pf ~]$ /usr/bin/pg_upgrade -b /usr/local/pgsql/bin -B /usr/bin
-d /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data13 -D /mnt/work/var/lib/pgsql/data --link
-U postgres Performing Consistency Checks -----------------------------
Checking cluster versions ok
Checking database user is the install user ok
Checking database connection settings ok
Checking for prepared transactions ok
Checking for system-defined composite types in user tables ok
Checking for reg* data types in user tables ok
Checking for contrib/isn with bigint-passing mismatch ok
Checking for user-defined encoding conversions ok
Checking for user-defined postfix operators ok
Checking for incompatible polymorphic functions ok
Creating dump of global objects ok
Creating dump of database schemas
ok
encodings for database "template1" do not match: old "UTF8", new
"SQL_ASCII" Failure, exiting
"template1" is not a DB I've ever messed with; so this will require that
I fire up the old version and change the encoding somehow?
Is this likely to repeat for my actual databases?
Sorry if this is noise...
>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>>
>
>
