Thanks Christophe for the clarification. That's not quite right. A PostgreSQL cluster (in the traditional sense, > which means one PostgreSQL server handling a particular endpoint) is > isolated from any other clusters on the same machine. >
Thanks. I think I had a misunderstanding over the "cluster" eariler. So a PostgreSQL cluster is a PostgreSQL server that we're talking about in general. This means per-DB KEY within a cluster/server is impossible without splitting the whole shared storage among databases, which is indeed a significant amount of work. > And, to be somewhat blunt, is Rubrik prepared to pay for it? This > engineering effort needs to be funded by someone, since engineers have to > eat. This is not to say that any feature someone is willing to pay for > will make it into PostgreSQL, but an effort of this size, to have any hope > of reaching the point of being accepted, will need someone to pay the > salaries of the people working on it. > I cannot speak on behalf of Rubrik - I'm just exploring PostgreSQL as a solution for one of my team's projects thus the questions. Nothing is finalized yet but we prefer a managed solution provided by some cloud infra providers so the context I'm getting here will allow me to better understand our provider's solution and their road map. Thanks Tony
