On 9/26/23 12:46, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron<ronljohnso...@gmail.com> writes:
Is there a way to define the SETOF record on the fly, like you do with
RETURNS TABLE (f1 type1, f2 type2)?
Doesn't RETURNS TABLE meet the need already?
That rationale means that RETURN SETOF is not needed, and can be removed
from Pg, since "RETURNS TABLE meet the need already".
But of course there /are/ times when RETURN SETOF /is/ useful.
So... can ad hoc SETOF definitions be created in the function definition, or
is CREATE TYPE the only way to do it?
--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
