On 3/15/24 03:42, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
You solve a problem that no one has. Data belonging together may still
be divided into schemas in a database. Thus, the metadata is also
reported and archived individually per database.
I am not sure, we are taking about the same problem, but would be
surprised to be the only one having experienced filling disks. Maybe, I
am just that old already that disk space has become so cheep, the
problem does not exist any longer.
With respect to metadata and databases: The point is not that I cannot
see the tables in another schema (I believe, did not check yet), but in
other databases. While this actually does not matter much, I still hold
That is backwards, schemas are namespaces within a database you can see
their contents from the local(database) system catalogs.
it true that a disk getting filled up does not care in which database or
schema a explosively growing table resides. So, if I have a disk getting
filled up, I would like to get easily information on the problematic
structures in one go. With PostgreSQL this does not seem to be possible
out of the box. I now can query each database separately, or I can
create auxiliary structures like dblink and views to accommodate for a
"single" query solution. My two dimes.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
