On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 2:56 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
wrote:

> On 8/9/24 14:13, yudhi s wrote:
> > Hello,
> > It's version 15.4 postgres. Where we have an insert working fine, but
> > then a similar insert with the same 'timestamp' value, when trying to be
> > executed through merge , it fails stating "You will need to rewrite or
> > cast the expression.". Why so?
> >
> > *Example:-*
> > https://dbfiddle.uk/j5S7br-q <https://dbfiddle.uk/j5S7br-q>*
> > *
> >
> > CREATE TABLE tab1 (
> >      id varchar(100) ,
> >      mid INT,
> >      txn_timestamp TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
> >      cre_ts TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL
> > ) PARTITION BY RANGE (txn_timestamp);
> >
> > CREATE TABLE tab1_2024_08_09 PARTITION OF tab1
> >      FOR VALUES FROM ('2024-08-09 00:00:00') TO ('2024-08-10 00:00:00');
> >
> > -- Below insert works fine
> > INSERT INTO tab1
> >      (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
> > VALUES
> >      ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d84', 123,
> > '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z', '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z');
> >
> > -- Below merge , which trying to insert similar row but failing
> >
> > WITH source_data (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts) AS (
> >      VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d66', 123,
> > '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z', '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z')
> > )
> > INSERT INTO tab1 (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
> > SELECT id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts
> > FROM source_data
> > ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE
> > SET    mid = EXCLUDED.mid,
> >      txn_timestamp = EXCLUDED.txn_timestamp,
> >      cre_ts = EXCLUDED.cre_ts;
> >
> > ERROR: column "txn_timestamp" is of type timestamp with time zone but
> > expression is of type text LINE 24: SELECT id, mid, txn_timestamp,
> > cre_ts ^ HINT: You will need to rewrite or cast the expression.
>
>
> VALUES:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-values.html
>
> "When VALUES is used in INSERT, the values are all automatically coerced
> to the data type of the corresponding destination column. When it's used
> in other contexts, it might be necessary to specify the correct data
> type. If the entries are all quoted literal constants, coercing the
> first is sufficient to determine the assumed type for all:
>
> SELECT * FROM machines
> WHERE ip_address IN (VALUES('192.168.0.1'::inet), ('192.168.0.10'),
> ('192.168.1.43'));
> "
>
> The VALUES is not directly attached to the INSERT, you will need to do
> explicit casts:
>
> VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d66', 123,
> '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z'::timestamptz,
> '2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z'::timestamptz)
>
>
>
Thank You Adrian and David.

Even converting the merge avoiding the WITH clause/CTE as below , is still
making it fail with the same error. So it seems , only direct "insert into
values" query can be auto converted/casted but not the other queries.

In our case , we were using this merge query in application code(in Java)
as a framework to dynamically take these values as bind values and do the
merge of input data/message. But it seems we have to now cast each and
every field which we get from the incoming message to make this merge work
in a correct way. I am wondering if the only way now is to get the data
types from information_schema.columns and then use the cast function to
write the values of the merge query dynamically casted/converted for each
of the fields in the application code. Please correct me if my
understanding is wrong.

MERGE INTO tab1 AS target
USING (VALUES ('5efd4c91-ef93-4477-840c-a723ae212d99', 123,
'2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z','2024-08-09T11:33:49.402585600Z')) AS
source(id, mid,txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
ON target.id = source.id
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET mid  = source.mid
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, mid, txn_timestamp, cre_ts)
    VALUES (source.id,source.mid,  source.txn_timestamp, source.cre_ts);

Reply via email to