On 2024-09-21 20:55:13 +0530, Lok P wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 8:07 PM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pg...@hjp.at> wrote: [... lots of code elided. method2 used 1 insert per row, method3 1 insert for 50 rows ...]
> On my laptop, method2 is about twice as fast as method3. But if I
> connect to a database on the other side of the city, method2 is now more
> than 16 times faster than method3 . Simply because the delay in
> communication is now large compared to the time it takes to insert those
> rows.
>
>
>
> Thank you so much.
> I was expecting method-3(batch insert) to be the fastest or atleast as you
> said
> perform with similar speed as method-2 (row by row insert with batch commit)
Oops, sorry! I wrote that the wrong way around. Method 3 is the fastest.
I guess I meant to write "method2 takes about twice as long as method3"
or something like that.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | h...@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
