On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote: > On 6/19/25 06:09, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > Hi. Little mystery we don't understand. v17. > Does 'all' include the public schema?
No. We don't touch `public` at all, beside pgcrypto ending up inside it. > > Of course, the DB owner role was not dropped. Can't in fact. > > Somehow, the pgcrypto extension has disappeared, as side-effects of the > > drops. > > Was it in fact installed in the public schema? Sure was. It's my own command, but good enough. --DD D:\>ppg -c my17 -d dd_v168a database_ --extensions Connected OK (postgresql://ddevienne@localhost:5417/dd_v168a) ======================================================= | Name | Version | Owner | Schema | ======================================================= | pgcrypto | 1.3 | "Acme-DBA:000ik2" | public | | plpgsql | 1.0 | postgres | pg_catalog | ======================================================= 2 installed extensions (out of 61) Which runs SELECT extname, extversion, extowner::regrole::text as owner, extnamespace::regnamespace::text as "schema" FROM pg_extension ORDER BY 1