On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 06:40:58AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 00:57 +0200, Pierre Barre wrote: > > Looking forward to your feedback and questions! > > I think the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome is to > convince notoriously paranoid DBAs that this tall stack > provides reliable service, honors fsync() etc.
Is there a test suite that can be used to test PG's ACIDity in the face of simulated power failures? > Performance is great, but it is not everything. If things > perform surprisingly well, people become suspicious. +1 > > P.S. The full project includes a custom NFS filesystem too. > > "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in > PostgreSQL circles... Certainly NFSv3 should. NFSv4 is much safer but I've no experience running PG on it and I assume there will be cases where recovery from network and/or server failures is slow.
