> On Oct 20, 2025, at 6:58 AM, Rich Shepard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Rob Sargent wrote:
> 
>>> Okay. Now I'm curious: why do you write this?
> 
>> The way I read your description of how you use these columns currently
>> suggests to me that they could be handled by a single timestamp column.
>> The cost/benefit of converting is another thing altogether.
> 
> Rob,
> 
> Since either way works I'll save the time cost of converting because my
> tables will never be really large.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rich
> 

For sure! Your call
> 


Reply via email to