On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 4:41 PM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/17/25 13:12, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 3:50 PM Laurenz Albe <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2025-11-17 at 18:25 +0100, Marc Millas wrote: > > > Can someone point me to any doc describing why and how much space > > postgres uses on the swap of a debian machine ? > > > it's an old postgres 10, because it is used by a product for > > which only this version is certified. > > > (no comment on that, please) > > > > I'm biting down a comment. > > > > > > "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" works just fine (until it doesn't). > > The problem is when it doesn't work anymore, the work load to move to a > newer version is that much greater. That's my point. If it just *kept* working, there would be no problem. > Keeping the version within spitting > distance of the latest supported version, to me, is a good idea. > As much as people love to complain about how useless PCI DSS is (see the recent thread on TDE), there's one benefit: ensuring that companies keep computers patched and running supported software. -- Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce. Don't boil me, I'm still alive. <Redacted> lobster!
