On 2/16/26 05:24, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
Hi PGDG Team



We’re currently facing an issue with PgBouncer transaction pooling mode, where prepared statements are failing, and we are unable to modify the application code to disable or change how prepared statements are used.

Switching to session pooling mode is not feasible for us because we have a very high number of connections that we cannot fully control. Environment details: PgBouncer version: 1.25.1 PostgreSQL version: 16.11

  The specific error we’re seeing is:

bind message has 43 result formats but query has 47 columns

ERROR: unnamed prepared statement does not exist Repeatedly logs

 Has anyone encountered this issue with transaction pooling and prepared statements? Are there any PgBouncer parameters or settings we can use to mitigate this problem without requiring application‑level changes? Any guidance or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

A little exploration/searching would have revealed:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html

5), How to use prepared statements with transaction pooling?

Which leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html#how-to-use-prepared-statements-with-transaction-pooling

which in turn leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/config.html#max_prepared_statements

Note though the caveat in last link:

"Note: This tracking and rewriting of prepared statement commands does not work for SQL-level prepared statement commands, so PREPARE, EXECUTE and DEALLOCATE are forwarded straight to Postgres. The exception to this rule are the DEALLOCATE ALL and DISCARD ALL commands, these do work as expected and will clear the prepared statements that PgBouncer tracked for the client that sends this command."



Regards
Durga Mahesh


--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]


Reply via email to