My understanding is that the mysql server is at a Linode facility in PA, the current production postgres server is in Asheville NC, and the intended new server is a Azure server in the eastern US, not sure exactly where.
The two small matviews refresh, the two bigger ones fail, so it seems size-related, which is why I was wondering if the settings might make a difference because this server isn't fully production-scale yet. But weve transferred 175 GB files to it in about 6 hours so I think the net connection itself is probably not the issue. Mike Nolan On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 4:11 PM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/26/26 1:59 PM, Michael Nolan wrote: > > We have a connection from a PostgreSQL server to a MySQL server which is > > used to update a materialized view on the PostgreSQL server from tables > > on the MySQL server (running CIVI-CRM, which may not be relevant.) > > > > We are trying to move the PostgreSQL server to a new cloud server. > > > > On the current production system, all the materialized views work, but > > the biggest of them can take about an hour. > > > > On the new system, the smallest of the materialized views works, but the > > larger ones all seem to time out. > > "... move the PostgreSQL server to a new cloud server", where is that > relative to the MySQL server compared to old Postgres server? > > > > > Could this be some kind of setting on PostgreSQL, like a memory or > > buffer issue? > > > > Mike Nolan > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > [email protected] >
