Is the fact that other companies are taking 
Over support for pgBackRest documented?


Sent from my iPhone

On May 3, 2026, at 8:48 AM, Jan Karremans <[email protected]> wrote:

You can safely recommend pgBackRest as several PostgreSQL companies have already stepped up to take over/fork pgBackRest.

On 3 May 2026, at 14:30, masheed ullah <[email protected]> wrote:

The issue is, 13tb database BARMAN backup is taking 20 hours and restore takes 24 hours.
So the main agenda is to reduce the backup time to less than 10hours.

 So does any solution/ tool I recommend to client.

. I just checked pgBeckRest has no more support, so I can not suggest it to client.

On Sun, May 3, 2026 at 3:25 PM Jan Karremans <[email protected]> wrote:
My thinking would be to have the different directories on different tiers of storage.

Cheers,
Jan

> On 3 May 2026, at 14:21, Laurenz Albe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2026-05-03 at 14:10 +0200, Jan Karremans wrote:
>> Contrary to Oracle, a table space in PostgreSQL is a directory. And not a logical abstraction.
>> Moving tables from one table space to another becomes so much easier by that.
>
> I am confused.  Yes, if you have more than a single (default) tablespace,
> moving tables between tablespaces becomes possible and hence easier.
> But why would you want to move tables between tablespaces in the first place?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe



--
Best Regards,
Masheed Ullah



Reply via email to