As I mentioned I already applied it.
> Hello!
>
> I think this is a bug. But it's said not to report any bugs unless you're
> sure that it's a bug, so I'm asking heer is this a bug?
>
> template1=> select netmask('10.0.0.1/0');
> netmask
> ---------------
> 255.255.255.255
> (1 row)
>
> This happens because
> word << shift
> uses only 5 low bits of shift (this is described in docs on Intel processor).
> Running
> word << 32
> on sparc also gives unchanegd word
>
> I've included a patch for 6.5.
> I think it will work with 6.5.1
>
> --
> Oleg.
Content-Description:
[Attachment, skipping...]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
************
