-On [20000704 08:00], Thomas Lockhart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I think this is a bad idea for the following reasons:
>> 1) It is trying to be a GPL in what it is trying to achieve without
>> actually being well thought out. Any person who "submits" modifications
>> must do so under the same licence. Submits to what or whom?
>
>It is *not* trying to be GPL. It is trying to be BSD, while extending
>liability protection to the current cast of developers, who are (I'm
>pretty sure) not covered in any of the wording of the UCB-generated
>license.
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
Seems pretty clear to me. ``In no event shall the author or
contributors be liable for any...''
Anyways, why do people always have to start whole threads on -announce?
Reply-to set. Please honour it.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org]
Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best
The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>
Malam bulan dipagar bintang makin indah jika dipandang bagai gadis beri
senyuman pada bujang idaman...
