On Nov 15, 2007 8:17 PM, Sam Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Albe suggested, a view is about all that's going to help the poor > people who work with this. When I do this sort of thing, I tend to > find that there are very few queries that actually need everything all > together in one place.
True in our case also. > It's generally that (using the naming above) > that you'd do a query on "table1", "test" and something that references > "test". Queries that reference "test", "table1" and "table2" are > reasonably rare. Of course, it could be that I was just lucky here. Now I know we are not alone handling these type of tables :-) Best regards, Ma Sivakumar -- மா சிவகுமார் எல்லோரும் எல்லாமும் பெற வேண்டும் http://masivakumar.blogspot.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
