> > Yes, but I'd like something better than "near real time" as the above
> > page describes. Or maybe someone could clarify that.... Besides,
> > EnterpriseDB does not save me enough money. In my current commercial
> > DB, if a transaction is committed on the master, it is guaranteed to
> > be committed to the secondary. In our business, losing one customer
> > order could lose us the customer for good.
>
> So you want synchronous replication. Search on that term in the
> archives for possible solutions (or lack thereof) in postgres.
>
> If you don't specify your requirements clearly, don't expect useful
> advice ;-)
I'm not looking for advice. My original contribution to this thread
suggested a preferred course of future development. I know what my
options are with the present version, but I see room for improvement.
Jeff
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
