me too.

On Wednesday 12. December 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
>"Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>> Joshua D. Drake, 11.12.2007 17:43:
>>>> O.k. this might be a bit snooty but frankly it is almost 2008. If
>>>> you are still a top poster, you obviously don't care about the
>>>> people's content that you are replying to, to have enough wits to
>>>> not top post.
>>>
>>> I personally find non-trimmed bottom postings at lot more annoying
>>> than top-postings. But then that's probably just me.
>>
>> It's not just you.  Much as I am annoyed by top-posting, I am much
>> more so by people who top-post at the bottom.  Hey, did I say
>> something stupid?  No -- think about it.  These guys do exactly the
>> same thing as top-posters, except it is much worse because the
>> actual text they wrote is harder to find.
>>
>> --
>> Alvaro Herrera                        
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/ "In fact, the basic problem
>> with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not crufty enough, so the
>> cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by the Conservation
>> of Cruft Principle."  (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of
>> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our
>> extensive FAQ?
>>
>>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>I agree.



-- 
Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to