Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Huh, why is it awkward? > > > > > > Alternatively, you can send the signal directly using <command>kill</> > > > (or <command>pg_ctl kill TERM [process id]</>). > > > > I think we should mention Windows in there somewhere, because it isn't > > "alternatively" on Windows. > > Actually, this whole change is a bit silly, because the text now says > something like: > > "You can send these signals using pg_ctl kill. Alternatively you can > use kill (or pg_ctl kill)"
Wow, yea, I see that now, but it is alone a paragraph above. I updated the text to: The <xref linkend="app-pg-ctl"> program provides a convenient interface for sending these signals to shut down the server. Alternatively, you can send the signal directly using <command>kill</> on non-Windows systems. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org/
