----- Original Message ----
> From: Peter Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:41:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ECPG problem with 8.3
>
> Fetch with a variable seems to be almost the only useful way of
> using
>
FETCH
> ABSOLUTE (or any of the variants that have count parameter).
>
> For backwards compatibility wouldn't it be better to do the sprintf
> in
>
the ECPG
> preprocessor if the count is a variable rather than generate an
> error?
I'd like to add to this discussion from an Oracle Pro*C (Oracle's name for
embedded SQL) perspective. Most of the Pro*C code that I've worked with over
the years uses a variable for the fetch count as well. It'd be nice if there
was some way to support this convention directly in ECPG (assuming it doesn't
create maintenance/security issues) for anyone porting applications from Oracle
to Postgresql.
Regards,
Shelby Cain
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
