Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make a
> strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for <
> 8.2.
You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions
thus-and-so are *already* EOL'd. What the OP seems to be insisting
is that we produce a formal policy and timetable for future EOL
decisions, neither of which seem very likely or desirable to me.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
