On Mar 18, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Dann Corbit wrote:
correct results for this query:
create table t1 (c1 int not null, c2 int not null, c3 char(5), c4 int,
c5 int, constraint pk_t1 PRIMARY KEY (c5,c4));
create table t2 (tc1 int not null, c1 int not null, c2 int not null,
c5
char(5), constraint fk_t2 FOREIGN KEY (c1,c2) references t1 (c5,c4));
select CONSTRAINT_NAME, TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME, ORDINAL_POSITION from
information_schema.key_column_usage where TABLE_NAME in ('t1', 't2');
So the only thing that will be missing are the indexes that are none
of
the above.
It's a shame that there really is no information schema for indexes in
that category.
Careful with that, foreign keys are not at all indexes although it is
common practice to put indexes on columns with them.
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
