Adam Rich wrote: > > > Oh, then there should have been some options in the survey along the > > > lines of "things are fine how they are." > > > > Oh, a bit of answer-forcing wasn't beneath him. > > > Ummm... Isn't that what Option A is about ? > > > 1) What type of names do you prefer? > ------------------------------- > a) old notation - createdb, createuser ... > b) new one with pg_ prefix - pg_createdb, pg_creteuser ... > c) new one with pg prefix - pgcreatedb, pgcreateuser ... > d) remove them - psql is the solution > e) remove them - pgadmin is the solution
One very minimal idea that isn't listed here is just to rename createuser to createdbuser or createpguser, with similar changes for dropuser, createlang, and droplang. That gives all commands a 'db' or 'pg' in part of the command, with no underscores, and it matches the existing command that already have 'db'. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
