Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> >> D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> >>> Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to modify ENUM
> >>> datatypes because we all know that you will eventually need that
> >>> feature whether you males, females, and unknowns think so or not.
> >> +1
> >
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
> > type
>
> And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?).
Yep, updated:
* Allow adding/removing enumerated values to an existing enumerated
data
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
