On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is it reasonable behavior to have \timing along toggle and \timing on
> > / \timing off be a forced switch?  Just thinking of other scripts
> > where this isn't a problem and having to update them.
> 
> The command without an argument should certainly keep the old toggle
> behavior, for backwards compatibility.

Attached patch does some of the right thing, but doesn't yet handle
error cases.  How liberal should we be about capitalization, spelling,
etc.?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Index: src/bin/psql/command.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/bin/psql/command.c,v
retrieving revision 1.188
diff -r1.188 command.c
887c887,897
<               pset.timing = !pset.timing;
---
>               char       *opt = psql_scan_slash_option(scan_state,
>                                                                               
>                  OT_NORMAL, NULL, true);
>               if (opt)
>               {
>                       if (strcmp(opt, "on") == 0)
>                               pset.timing = true;
>                       else if (strcmp(opt, "off") == 0)
>                               pset.timing = false;
>               }
>               else
>                       pset.timing = !pset.timing;
-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to