On Wed, 14 May 2008, Gerald Quimpo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not really :-). I was just looking at the simplest possible thing that could > work. I've looked at versioned/temporal databases. But you probably > can't go there since it definitely adds a lot of complexity to your app > and queries. Are you able to change your representation of "deleted" > rows? e.g., can you have an > > is_deleted boolean not null default false > > column there? that's how i'd have gone, myself, instead of mangling > the plate number.
That's really how it should be done. But there are really significant design mistakes made years ago, and I gave up messing with them. Will just accomplish migration and that's all. Regards. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
