Sorry, guys, for wasting bandwidth on this! You guys gave just the answer I wanted to hear. Sounds like there aren't any problems.
Not knowing about such things, I was scared by the following quote. Perhaps binaries do not need to be compiled as 64 bit binaries on a 64 bit machine? Or perhaps it's way out of date (2004) or simply wrong. from http://www.osnews.com/story/5768/Are_64-bit_Binaries_Really_Slower_than_32-bit_Binaries_/page3/ " ... The Compile Factor Getting applications to compile as 64-bit binaries can be tricky. The build process for some applications, such as OpenSSL, have 64-bit specifically in mind, and require nothing fancy. Others, like MySQL and especially PostgreSQL (I was originally going to include PostgreSQL benchmarks) took quite a bit of tweaking. There are compiler flags, linker flags, and you'll likely end up in a position where you need to know your way around a Makefile..." In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Benjamin Weaver wrote: > >> I have heard of problems arising from compiling PostGreSQL (8.3) on > >> 64-bit processors. > > > From who? > > Perhaps someone who remembers PG 6.4 or thereabouts? > > Certainly any version released in the last couple of years has been > tested about as heavily on 64-bit platforms as 32-bit. > > regards, tom lane -- Benjamin Weaver Faculty Research Associate, Imaging Papyri, Greek Fragments Projects, Oxford email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (0)1865 610236 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
