Tom Lane wrote:
Klint Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe you've found a memory leak in pg_dump (it wouldn't be the first
>> one).  Does this database have a particularly large number of objects?

> I wouldn't call it large - 27 tables, 111 functions, 21 custom types > (used for set returning function results).

[ squint... ]  Hard to see how that could be eating half a gig of
pg_dump memory space.

Would you be willing to send me a "pg_dump -s" (ie, just schema no
data) dump of this DB?  Off-list of course.

Upon more investigation pg_dump 8.3.1 on linux (ubuntu feisty) across the network completes properly.

klint.

--
Klint Gore
Database Manager
Sheep CRC
A.G.B.U.
University of New England
Armidale NSW 2350

Ph: 02 6773 3789 Fax: 02 6773 3266
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to