>> The scenario: >> There are two separate processes ? one (P1) inserting (not >> updating) data to a table at a high rate (around one record in 10ms) and >> another (P2) selecting the data from the same table for further >>processing. P1 >> and P2 use separate connection to the Database and P1 sends a trigger to >>P2 >> after inserting the data to the PostgreSQL.
>What do you mean with 'P1 sends a TRIGGER to P2'? You can't send a >TRIGGER to another process. By 'send a trigger' what I meant was, P1 sends a TCP packet to P2 (It is the preferred IPC in our application) asking it to start querying for data. >> The issue: >> >> P2 tries to query the data from the table, and the result set is >> empty. I modified the logic to send the trigger only after making sure >>that P1 >> can successfully query the last record it inserted. >> I would like to know why P1 can retrieve the data from the table while P2 >> can?t. >Wild guess (maybe i misunderstand you): You insert the Data with P1 >within a TRANSACTION and you haven't commited this insert. In this case, >P2 can't see the uncommited data. P1 did commit its insertion and verified it by successfully querying the last inserted data, before sending the TCP packet - the trigger - to P2 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
