Bill Wordsworth wrote:
> ...resending, email didn't go through.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bill Wordsworth
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is this recommended?
>>
>> pg_query("begin transaction read write;", $connection);
>> if(pg_transaction_status($connection) == 2) {
>>        pg_query("insert...;", $connection);
>>        pg_query("insert...;", $connection);
>>        pg_query("insert...;", $connection);
>> }
>> pg_query("commit transaction;", $connection);
>> pg_close($connection);
>>
>> Now *any* error inside transaction will trigger auto rollback for
>> *all* inserts so I don't need to explicitly issue conditional
>> rollback? Also is "begin/commit transaction" == "start/end
>> transaction"??

What if something gets an invalid state (eg you expect a record to have
'active = 156' but it's something else).

So in some cases yes you'll need to do a rollback. On the other hand, if
you don't explicitly do a commit, everything is rolled back.

Yes "begin" == "start transaction" and "commit" == "end transaction".

-- 
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to