On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vinogradovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not that I expect a lot of improvement by having non-WAL > indexing, it just sounds logical to me to have that, since > index can be re-created fast enough during recovery,
and why you think that? if they are non WAL logged the only way to re-create them after a recovery is with a REINDEX... dropping the index and create after the bulk is just the same, i think... -- regards, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 87171157 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
