On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Joao Ferreira gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> TW, "more aggressive routine vacuuming" does NOT mean "use vacuum >> full". >> Vacuum full tends to make index bloat worse, not better. >> >> regards, tom lane >> > Ok. so what does it mean ? > > > > I'm a bit lost here. I'm currently executing VACUUM FULL _and_ REINDEX > (tbls & idxs) every week. > > Should I keep the REINDEX and drop VACUUM FULL ? > > How do I iterate to a better approach ?
It's better to run REGULAR vacuums more often than to vacuum full OR reindex OR both. If your machine doesn't have the I/O bandwidth to withstand being vacuumed during the day then you either have to have a fairly large free space map and vacuum off hours or buy a machine with more I/O bandwidth. With the sleep settings in vacuum and autovacuum you can usually get away with autovacuum running during the day. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
