"Roberts, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am noticing a large number of temp schemas in my database. We use
> temp tables but it doesn't appear that the schemas get dropped for some
> reason.
That's intentional. There doesn't seem a lot of value in dropping a
catalog entry that'll just have to be created again later.
> This greatly slows down how long it takes pgAdmin to connect
> because it retrieves thousands of pg_temp_% schemas.
Why have you got thousands of them? If you are running with thousands
of active backends, may I suggest a connection pooler?
(It might be a good idea to fix pgAdmin so it ignores other sessions'
temp schemas, though.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
