On 2008-09-09 05:07, Kashmir wrote:
> querying data from august 1st - august 25:
> Total runtime: 26762.999 ms
>
> now querying data from august 1st - august 29:
> Total runtime: 20123.584 ms
>
> Any idea why these analysises look so different? the only
> query-difference is the 2nd timestamp value, it is a little higher in
> the 2nd query...
Did you realize that this second query returns over 6 seconds faster
than first?
If you query a significant portion of data a table scan is faster than
using indexes as a drive does not need to seek that much.
You can control when it will switch to seq-scan tuning
seq_page_cost/random_page_cost parameters in postgresql.conf. But test
also other queries common for your usage.
Regards
Tometzky
--
...although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a
moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you
were...
Winnie the Pooh
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
