On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jef Peeraer wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Jef Peeraer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > i am using the xml add-ons, but the date output format seems to be > > > > > wrong : > > > > I think the conversion to xml intentionally always uses ISO date format, > > > > because that's required by some spec somewhere. > > > Yes, it follows XML Schema. Which is why the output format is even > > > slightly > > > different from the SQL-mandated ISO format. > > i understand, but that makes it very difficult to change the date format > > afterwards. i simple flag to indicate no date conversion would be > > helpfull.... > > Well, these table_to_xml etc. functions are heavily constrained by the SQL > standard, XML Schema, and others. They do what they are supposed to do. You > are free to design your own XML export format or apply postprocessing to the > existing ones (XSLT?). I don't think we should overload the existing > functions with everyone's favorite but apparently completely nonstandard > formatting variant flag. it would be a flag to indicate no conversion from the datestyle settings in the database...i think, from a users perspective, the table_to_xml is completely useless, if you have to reformat everything afterwards.... jef > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
