"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Shouldn't PG make all efforts to not execute something when the result is
>> > already known?
>>
>> Not if said effort would cost more than is saved, which would be by far
>> the most likely result if we tried to cache all function results.
>>
>
> Sorry Tom, I confused STABLE  with IMMUTABLE; my bad.

No, this is equally untrue for immutable.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to