On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Kynn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for all your suggestions! > Kynn
If an approximate count will work take a look in pg_stat_user_tables right after a vacuum. It's much faster. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
