On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:45 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote: > Hello Joshua, > Well, yeah, maybe Postgres-R is going to loose that sale as well. But > hey, it's not long ago since you've open sourced it. What makes you > think that you've already "lost that sale"? I for example didn't find > time to look at the Replicator sources up until now. > > However, IMO there's more to a fork than just having different source > trees. When I hear of a fork, I think of something more like SQL-Ledger > vs. LedgerSMB, where major disagreements play a role. Everything else is > just ordinary evolution of software ;-) >
Heh fair enough. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
